Successful Faith and Freedom Summit in Brussels

Faith and Freedom Summit 2018 - Brussels 27 June 2018

Practicing What We Preach in Europe

Last 28th of June at Brussels in the premises of the prestigious Solvay Library at the European Parliament the Faith and Freedom Summit 2018 was successfully held.
Speakers and participants from several countries attended a packed one-day conference that covered the many aspects of the protection of freedom of religion and belief in Europe and its challenges in the modern society.

The relevance and importance of this summit was to ponder and focus on the problems experienced by religious and spirituality groups and by their members in Europe with an eye on the obligations on States to promote and implement their freedom of religion and belief in accordance with the international human rights standards.

There have been several speeches and interesting round tables in which eminent scholars, professors, lawyers and activists have masterfully elaborated on issues ranging from the problems experienced by individuals and groups and the activities of NGOs and the initiatives taken by politicians in this field in Europe and the legal implications between law and religion.

Speakers included, among others,  Vincent Berger, notorious jurist and academician who served in the role of Jurisconsult of the European Court of Human Rights for 37 years, Congressman Bob McEwen, Former Member, American Delegation to the European Parliament, Jan Figel, EU Special Envoy for the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the European Union, Amjad Bashir MEP, member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, European Parliament, Salvatore Martinez, representative of the presidency of OSCE, Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Patricia Duval, Human Rights lawyer in Paris, Ahmed Shaheed, Special Rapporteur on human rights to UN Human Rights Council, Bashy Quraishy, Secretary General of EMISCO, Sam Brownback, U.S. Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom, Eric Roux, president of EIFRF, European Interreligious Forum for Religious Freedom, Martin Weightman, director of the All Faiths Network, Marco Ventura, Professor of Law & Religion at University of Siena, Ivan Arjona Pelado, director of the European and Human Rights Office of the Church of Scientology, Hans Noot, director of the Gerard Noodt Foundation, Greg Mitchell, co-Chair, International Religious Freedom Roundtable, Thomas Schirrmacher, president of the International Society for Human Rights, Juan Ferreiro Galguera, Professor of Law and Religion, University of A Coruña, Rosita Šorytė, Lithuanian diplomat, President of the ORLIR, International Observatory of Religious Liberty of Refugees, Kristina Arriaga de Bucholz, USCIRF Commissionner and Vice-Chairwoman of the Commission, Willy Fautré of Human Rights without Frontiers.

FOB was represented by our chairman Alessandro Amicarelli who moderated the law and religion panel and who concluded the session making the following powerful statement:

"As a matter of fact most cases of violation of FoRB, freedom of religion and belief, originate from unfair or intrinsically discriminatory legislation or from the wrongful application of the law placing restrictions and limitations on the spiritual and religious groups. This naturally leads us to wonder: Do we really need to regulate religion and spirituality in Europe by placing restrictions and limitations to freedom of religion and belief? And in the positive, how? The answer is given by international human rights law that has developed the protection of FoRB through different steps. If back in 1948 the Universal Declaration on Human Rights set forth the minimum standards for the protection of religious liberty and other rights, instead the subsequent international instruments such as the UN International Covenants of 1966 and the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950, among others, made those minimum standards legally binding for States. In the following decades the Human Rights Council and the European Court of Human Rights, as well as other international bodies, have issued numerous decisions and judgements and recommendations or resolutions concerning freedom of thought, conscience and religion and belief. All these decisions and judgements and other official documents at international level, do constitute a massive normative corpus providing all the interpretations and guidelines for the national authorities to comply with the international human rights law when adopting new legislation or when dealing at different levels with freedom of religion and belief matters. States have all the means to protect and actually implement freedom of religion and belief. Transforming theory into practice is the essential and vital element for empowering change and to finally affirm freedom of religion and belief for all".

Indeed any restriction and limitation has to be placed in compliance with the law and the law itself has to be fair and respectful of the principles set forth in international law.

The event was an occasion for delegates to give a strong message to the European nations to Practice what We Preach in Europe, as the subtitle of the event suggested.

This message is perfectly in line with other initiatives we have taken as FOB particularly our Call to Nations that we launched in Florence in January 2018 and presented at the United Nations Palace in Geneva in March and that we keep disseminating as the proof States do have all means to promote and actually implement freedom of religion and belief in Europe - Transforming theory into practice is the key for empowering change!

During the last session some good news came from Italy where two members of the Church of Almighty God (CAG), a Christian minority heavily persecuted in China, had just been granted refugee status in Court after the refusal they had received from the refugee commission.

Many members of this religious group escape from China trying to find refuge in Europe and most of them have been refused the international protection either because the national authorities do not know the reality of persecution of this group in China or because the State collaborate with China against some groups considered as sects and deport their members.

FOB and its associated members and other lobbying groups are persistently and consistently operating to raise the issue of the persecution of the members of the Church of Almighty God and the need for them to be freed in China and to be granted refugee status in Europe when they seek it.

Recently our chairman in his capacity as international human rights lawyer practising in the UK has filed two complaints with the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on behalf of members of the CAG detained in China on the ground of their faith, namely for only being members of that religious community.

The authorities of the European countries have to realise its time to welcome all those who are victims of persecution or likely to be persecuted on the basis of their faith or belief in their countries and then take all positive actions to speedily and positively let them settle in Europe and peacefully enjoy freedom of religion and belief in accordance with the international and EU legislation.