Prof. Maria D'Arienzo, a member of the Scientific Committee of the European Federation for Freedom of Belief (FOB), is Full Professor of Ecclesiastical and Canon Law and Confessional Rights at the Department of Law of the University "Federico II" of Naples, and in charge of Ecclesiastical Law at the University of Calabria.
Director of the scientific magazine "Law and Religions", and a member of Boards of different Reviews and of other Committees, she is the author of different monographs and numerous articles dedicated mainly to the relationship between secularism and religious freedom in a comparative perspective, she reflects below on the topic of the restart of the religious ceremonies within the context of the Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic, focusing her attention on an interesting and balanced Proposal drafted by the DiReSom (Law, Religion and Multicultural society) Research Group, composed by professors and researchers associated to several Italian Universities, ranging from Messina to Trento, in which they advise the Government with a series of Guidelines for the cautious re-opening of the worship places within the Italian territory.
We hope that this proposal may be swiftly accepted by the government in favor of all religious groups, as hoped by the authors.
Mr Alessandro Amicarelli, attorney
European Federation for Freedom of Belief, Chairman
The resumption of religious activities in Phase 2 further stimulates a constructive dialogue between confessional authorities and public authorities. Therefore, as an ecclesiastic, in consideration of the next hoped-for restart of religious celebrations, I cannot fail to underline the delicacy and importance of the decisions that will be taken in these days for relations between the State and the Catholic Church, marked, in Phase 1, by a spirit of generous and fruitful collaboration. It should be emphasized above all that the commitment to cooperate loyally and mutually for the good of the country imposes itself with even greater rigor in relation to the exercise of public worship, a matter for which the constitutional and concordat provisions provide for the recognition of organizational autonomy in the hands of the Catholic Church.
The dense talks undertaken between the Italian Episcopal Conference and the Italian Government regarding the management of Phase 2 on the front of free participation in religious rites, so far suspended, seemed to move in this direction. In particular, lastly, the dialogue of the last 23 April between the Minister of the Interior and the CEI seemed to presuppose the shared formulation of a balance point represented by the possibility of allowing the celebration of the Masses with the participation of the faithful, starting from 4 May.
The Decree of the President of the Council of Ministers of 26 April last, for the entire period between 4 and 18 May, however, denied a resumption of religious activities, with the exception of ecclesiastical funeral, preferably allowed outdoors and in the presence of the family members of the de cuius – in the maximum number of 15 people – and in compliance with other security measures. The political choice, according to indiscretions, seemed to be suggested by the observations raised by the experts of the government's technical table, who found unsurpassed criticalities in attending the Holy Mass, represented both by the average advanced age of the faithful and by the inevitable "gatherings" that would occur formed especially at the celebration of the Sacrament of the Eucharist.
The reaction of the Italian Bishops was immediate, who in a Note circulated on the night of April 26, expressed their disappointment with respect to the government's position, considered entirely detrimental to freedom of worship and above all to the principle of bilaterality expressed in the many interlocutions of the days previous, which seemed to prelude to a different management of the so called Phase 2.
The intervention of the Italian Bishops led the President of the Council of Ministers to issue a press release, which confirmed the commitment to develop a protocol to accelerate the resumption of celebrations in the shortest possible time.
The tones of the clash were definitively smoothed out by the Holy Father himself, who in the homily of the Mass of April 28 in Santa Marta, called for obedience to civil laws and prudence in the face of the risk of a resurgence of the pandemic threat.
A protocol is therefore being prepared to allow the public exercise of worship in Phase 2 of the pandemic crisis. The commitment of ecclesiasticists and canonists has moved in this direction.
In particular, the members of the DiReSom research group (Law, Religions, Multicultural Society) entrusted the operational proposal to a position papers to allow the cautious resumption of the religious activities of all religious denominations.
Among the various proposals, the one elaborated by the DiReSom Research Group, which can be consulted HERE and which is fully proposed here, should be noted.
Maria d’Arienzo
Full Professor of Ecclesiastical and Canon Law
University of Naples Federico II
Proposal for a safe resumption of religious celebrations in Italy
As professors and researchers of law and religion in Italian public Universities, and as founders of the “Diresom” research group – which during this pandemic activated the first international web portal on Law, Religion and Coronavirus (https://diresom.net) – we are please submitting to the Italian government and to the religious bodies a contribution to the debate concerning the possibility of allowing celebrations of religious worship, in compliance with the measures which are necessary to prevent the infection of the Sars-Cov-2 virus, namely the cause of the Covid-19 disease.
1. State of affairs. The emergency rules which have been enacted in Italy to contain the contagion throughout the national territory have limited various freedoms. Mainly, freedom of movement has been limited, as it has been restricted only to the hypotheses of “verified work demands or situations of necessity or movements for health reasons”. In this emergency scenario, “religious and civil ceremonies, including funeral ceremonies” have also been suspended and the opening of places of worship has been conditioned to the “adoption of organizational measures aimed at avoiding gatherings of people, taking into account the size and the features of the spaces, so as to guarantee to visitors the possibility of respecting the distance between them of at least one meter … » (Order of the Prime Minister 8 March 2020).
Unfortunately, this emergency regulation has resulted to be comprehensively unclear.
It left room for a discretionary reading, which has been only partially resolved by the publication of responses on institutional sites, as the latter have always been nevertheless very restrictive about personal mobility. For example, the opening of places of worship has not been considered as a sufficient condition to make a move from one’s home legitimate, if the latter was not close to it (Faq 10 April 2020), even though entering the places of worship has been considered as acceptable – under generally established conditions – if the mobility had been determined by other legitimate reasons (Faq of the Ministry of Health of 15 March 2020; Note from the Central Directorate for Religious Affairs of the Ministry of the Interior, 27 March 2020).
On the occasion of the Easter celebrations, the participation in Catholic religious rites of a certain number of worshippers has been considered as acceptable, and the possibility to celebrate religious marriages has been clarified, provided only the presence of the celebrant [rectius: the religious minister, who is not the celebrant of the canonical marriage], of the married couple and of the witnesses, and, in any case, always in compliance with the prescribed sanitary rules and the necessary interpersonal distance.
Such rules, even if they have been specified in a ministerial note addressed to the Italian Episcopal Conference, must be considered operative towards all the expressions of religious worship by virtue of the principle of “laicità dello Stato”.
The headlines of the last few days have broken the news that there have been contacts between the Italian Episcopal Conference and the Government authorities so as to agree about appropriate ways of exercising freedom of worship in the so-called “second phase”, which has been announced for the period after 4 May 2020. However, the Order of the Prime Minister 26 April 2020 has fully preserved the general framework, only admitting the celebration of funerals, which should “preferably” be outdoors, with the participation of no more than 15 participants. The Italian Episcopal Conference has therefore issued an immediate note of dissent, complaining about the “impairment of the exercise of freedom of worship” and, on the same date, the Prime Minister announced that “in the coming days a Protocol will be studied which will allow the adherents to participate in liturgical celebrations as soon as possible in conditions of maximum security”..
2. Challenging issues. From a technical-legal point of view, everyone should remember that in our legal system freedom of worship of everyone is protected under article 19 of the Constitution, therefore differentiated rules based on religious affiliation are not admissible. This means that the Protocol referred to by the Prime Minister’s Office must provide measures addressed to all religious denominations, even those that have not entered into an agreement with the Italian state, pursuant to art. 8 paragraph 3 of the Constitution. We remind that the dialogue with religious denominations is constitutionally favored and represents a legal obligation, without however conferring on the religious actors a regulatory competence that is mirrored in the affairs of the state.
The principle which underlies the legitimacy of the both past and future emergency rules, consists in the prevention of contagion, therefore, for this purpose, subordinating ordinary social activities to compliance with specific conditions of caution is legitimate, taking into account both the type of space where each needs to enter and the reason that led to leaving everyone’s home. In the light of the general principles and guidelines contained in the Order of the Prime Minister April 26th 2020, which are globally aimed at introducing some partial relaxations of the previous restrictions on freedom of movement, in our opinion, considering mobility lawful for those who intend to go to a place of worship, also to participate in a religious celebration may be legitimate, as long as gatherings are prevented, social distancing is maintained and the necessary conditions of safety and sanitization of the premises are guaranteed. Limiting the stay in places of worship to the strictly necessary time will also be necessary.
3. Guidelines. In order to facilitate this operational possibility, we propose the adoption of the following guidelines. Such guidelines make the collective celebration of any religion subject to the respect of the same measures of social distancing and hygienic-sanitary nature that can be established for other similar allowed forms of people gathering.
1. The places of worship may be open only if the conditions of sanitization and hygiene, which have been established for the entry into other closed but open to public spaces, are provided, and in particular:
a) possibility to maintain the measure of interpersonal distancing is guaranteed;
b) cleanliness and environmental hygiene are guaranteed at least twice a day and according to the opening hours. Surfaces must be cleaned with chlorine and alcohol-based disinfectants;
c) adequate natural ventilation and air exchange is guaranteed;
d) availability and accessibility to disinfection systems of the hands is guaranteed;
e) the use of masks and disposable gloves is provided;
f) adequate access is available to information about the need to observe the mandatory hygiene measures and the prescribed social distancing at the entrance to the religious buildings.
2. The simultaneous entry into places of worship is allowed to a maximum number of people such as to allow compliance with the prescribed interpersonal distances:
a) the maximum number of people admitted to the entrance at the same time has to be considered in advance on the basis of the internal surface of the space (maximum three every forty square meters);
b) a warning has to be displayed at the entrance of the place of worship indicating the maximum number of simultaneously admissible people;
c) access is therefore properly organized under the responsibility of those who organize the worship meeting in order to limit the entrance to the maximum number of allowed people, and to prevent improper gatherings of people waiting outside the places of worship.
3. The celebration of worship in open spaces is encouraged, as in such spaces compliance with all the provisions adopted for entry into closed spaces is not required, without prejudice to the need to ensure social distancing.
4. The religious authorities have to take appropriate measures of accommodation of religious ceremonies so as to respect the measures of prevention of contagion, taking care of the observance of interpersonal distancing and prohibiting any promiscuous use of containers for drinks and food of any type and for any purpose
5. Religious authorities commit to inform adequately their adherents about the obligation not to leave their houses, and therefore not to participate in the religious celebrations, whenever they are subjected to the quarantine measures or have been tested positive for the virus or whenever they exhibit symptoms of respiratory infection and (higher than 37.5 ° C) fever. This also applies to religious ministers.
6. Appropriate representative bodies must be locally set up, so as to allow prefectures and mayors to monitor, in collaboration with the local faith communities, both the prevention of contagion and the respect of individual freedom to participate in religious celebrations. Such bodies have to make use of the advice of experts with proper technical-scientific skills, so that any specific precautionary measures may be adopted and adapted taking into account the specific local context.
The present Position Paper has been drafted by DiReSoM and is the result of the collective reflection of:
Pierluigi Consorti (director) – University of Pisa
Simone Baldetti – Università di Pisa
Fabio Balsamo – “Federico II” University of Napoli
Rossella Bottoni – University of Trento
Cristina Dalla Villa – University of Teramo
Antonello De Oto – University of Bologna
Mario Ferrante – University of Palermo
Fabio Franceschi – “La Sapienza” University of Roma
Luigi Mariano Guzzo – University of Catanzaro
Maria Cristina Ivaldi – University of Campania
Chiara Lapi – University of Pisa
Maria Luisa Lo Giacco – University of Bari
Adelaide Madera – University of Messina
Enrica Martinelli – University of Ferrara
Francesca Oliosi – University of Trento
Daniela Tarantino – University of Genova
Stefano Testa Bappenheim – University of Camerino
Alessandro Tira – University of Bergamo
Source DiReSom
