by Alessandro Amicarelli — A new hearing was held today in the long and troubled case of Konstantin Rudnev, the Russian spiritual teacher whose health has deteriorated to the point that several doctors have concluded that he cannot safely endure imprisonment. The hearing focused on the defense’s request to postpone the forensic medical examination scheduled for June 25, 2026. The outcome of this examination will determine whether Rudnev remains under house arrest or is returned to prison, a decision that carries potentially lifethreatening consequences for a man whose physical condition has been repeatedly described by specialists as fragile.

14 NGOs ask the British authorities to put an end to intimidation, harassment, and violence.

June 17, 2026

To the relevant authorities,

We, the undersigned NGOs, academics, and advocates for human rights and religious freedom, write to express our deep concern regarding the escalating pattern of harassment, violence, and targeted intimidation directed at members of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light (AROPL) in Crewe—particularly at Webb House—and increasingly at other locations where members reside.

by Alessandro Amicarelli — The 62^nd session of the United Nations Human Rights Council opens on June 15 in Geneva, and among the written submissions already filed is a substantial statement by the ECOSOC-accredited NGO CAPLC (Coordination des associations et des particuliers pour la liberté de conscience), a watchdog for religious liberty issues, on the OneTaste case. The document urges the Council to examine the implications of the convictions of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, who received sentences of nine and six-and-a-half years on March 30, 2026. CAPLC presents the case as a turning point in the interpretation of trafficking law, with consequences that extend far beyond the United States.

by Alessandro Amicarelli — In recent years, Argentina has witnessed a series of criminal cases that reveal a troubling pattern: prosecutors expanding their mandates far beyond the limits set by law, interpreting statutes creatively, and handling evidence with a degree of carelessness that raises serious human rights concerns. As an international human rights lawyer, I have followed these developments with increasing apprehension. The issue is not confined to one field or one community. It affects religious minorities stigmatized as cults, dissidents, indigenous activists, and ordinary citizens caught in the gears of a prosecutorial system that sometimes appears to operate without adequate checks.

by Massimo Introvigne — The European Court of Human Rights has delivered a judgment that reshapes the relationship between the Italian State and minority religions. On 11 June 2026, the Court unanimously held that Italy discriminated against the association representing Jehovah’s Witnesses in Italy, by keeping them outside the system of agreements known as intese. These agreements are the gateway to the country’s main religious funding mechanism, the “eight per thousand,” which allows taxpayers to choose religious bodies that receive 0.8% of their taxes.

By Alessandro Amicarelli — The Rudnev case continues to evolve in ways that would be difficult to believe were they not so thoroughly documented. What has now emerged is not an isolated irregularity, nor a momentary lapse in prosecutorial diligence, but one more instance in a long‑established pattern: the construction of allegations based on assumptions that are not only unverified, but demonstrably false. This latest episode—concerning supposed failures by several defendants to comply with routine registration obligations—fits seamlessly into that troubling continuum.

By Alessandro Amicarelli — Konstantin Rudnev has spent more than a decade behind bars. Eleven of those years were served in Russia after a trial that international observers regarded as deeply compromised. He is now detained in Argentina under accusations that mirror those used against him in Russia, a continuity that raises serious concerns about the transnational circulation of unverified allegations. His long experience of incarceration has led him to develop a reflection on the nature of prisons and the future of criminal justice. He recently published a short video that deserves attention, both for its tone and for the ideas it advances.

By Alessandro Amicarelli — The June 4 decision of the Court of Cassation of Argentina in the case of Konstantin Rudnev invites a careful examination through the lens of international law. The principles governing preliminary detention are among the most developed in global human rights jurisprudence. They exist to prevent a procedural measure from becoming a form of punishment. They require strict necessity, individualized assessment, and a constant evaluation of proportionality.

By Alessandro Amicarelli — On June 3, Argentina’s Court of Cassation will consider a request by the prosecutors to send again Konstantin Rudnev, who is currently under house arrest, to jail. This request arrives after a year marked by procedural irregularities, medical emergencies, and investigative choices that have placed the heaviest burden on the person least connected to the events that triggered the case. Having followed this matter closely, I believe the Court now has the opportunity to correct a trajectory that has caused profound harm and has produced no corresponding benefit for justice.

by Massimo Introvigne — The case of Russian spiritual teacher Konstantin Rudnev, detained in Argentina since 2025, has taken a dramatic and deeply worrying turn. CAP-LC and United for Human Rights have now submitted a new written statement to the UN Human Rights Council, warning that the situation has “significantly worsened” since their previous filing at the Council’s last session. That earlier statement, as “Bitter Winter” reported in January, already documented the role of Russian-generated disinformation in shaping the Argentinian proceedings.

by Massimo Introvigne — Germany is known for its reliability. Sometimes this is impressive—like with its precise engineering, on-time trains, and organized archives. Other times, it leads to oddities, such as the fact that for almost thirty years, the country’s domestic intelligence service monitored Scientology, long after the political fears of the 1990s had faded. The Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (Office for the Protection of the Constitution) has now discreetly ended this monitoring, much like someone quietly shutting a door they wish they had never opened.

Biased prosecutors who try to jail again a man under house arrest and in serious health conditions should be removed.

We, the undersigned organizations dedicated to the defense of freedom of religion or belief and the protection of fundamental human rights, express our deep concern regarding the situation of Konstantin Rudnev, a Russian spiritual teacher currently under house arrest in Argentina.

By Alessandro Amicarelli — When I first wrote about the case of Konstantin Rudnev in Argentina, I described it as an extraordinary example of prosecutorial overreach, a proceeding driven more by imagination than by evidence. At that time, I emphasized the misuse of pretrial detention, the construction of a trafficking narrative connected to a “cult” but unsupported by facts, and the institutional mistreatment inflicted on a young woman, E., whose vulnerability was transformed into the cornerstone of an accusation that collapsed the moment one examined the record.

By Marco Respinti — For fourteen months, the life of Konstantin Rudnev unfolded behind the walls of Rawson, Argentina’s most remote maximum‑security prison. Fourteen months without a conviction. Fourteen months without a trial. Fourteen months during which the Constitution seemed to apply to everyone except him. His case, as The European Times has documented, became a troubling example of how prosecutorial narratives can override judicial orders, medical evidence, and basic human rights.

By Alessandro Amicarelli — For years, I have defended individuals and communities targeted by states that see danger where none exists. Still, the case of Konstantin Rudnev in Argentina stands out—even after all I have seen—as an extraordinary instance of prosecutorial imagination. Rudnev remains in jail today despite three separate judicial orders, each converting his detention into house arrest. Three times judges have ruled he shouldn’t be in prison; three times the orders were ignored.

We are pleased to receive and publish the report sent to us by the Italian Falun Dafa Association on the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) transnational repression against Falun Gong. FOB has on several occasions addressed the dire situation faced by Falun Gong practitioners (and others) in China, who are victims of abuse, arbitrary detention, killings and forced organ harvesting. The issue had also come to the attention of the European Parliament, which, in a resolution dated 18 January 2024, took a stand against the persecution of Falun Gong in China.

By Hans Noot, HRWF — Across Europe, the relationship between the state and religion is changing. Studies show that government restrictions on religion have reached their highest levels in the last 20 years. New reports point to growing legal and social pressure on religious minorities. Instead of the older model that gave people wide freedom to live out their beliefs, we now see a kind of “managerial” secularism.

In the aftermath of the Orbán era, Hungary faces the long and difficult task of repairing the profound damage inflicted on its religious landscape. Over a period of 15 years, hundreds of minority religious communities were stripped of their legal status, de-registered, and pushed to the margins through a system that placed political discretion above basic human rights and fundamental freedoms. This pattern — where the government delegitimises minority faiths, centralises State control over religious recognition, and rewards only politically aligned groups— has been observed in several non‑democratic countries.

by Alessandro Amicarelli — The April 29 operation in Crewe, where some 500 British police officers—reportedly joined by Irish and Swedish personnel—stormed the headquarters of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light (AROPL), has generated serious questions about proportionality and the use of force. AROPL has filed a complaint with the United Nations for the mistreatments its members received in Sweden, and some see this action as the result of inputs to the UK from the Swedish police.

On 29 April 2026, the Norwegian Supreme Court quashed the ruling that had revoked the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ registration and their consequent access to state funding.

The Court also emphasised that the threshold for denying access to state funding and registration is high, and that Article 6 of the Norwegian Act on Religious Communities must be interpreted in the light of the autonomy of religious communities enshrined in Article 9 of the ECHR, read in conjunction with Article 11.